Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CSPRCSPR

News

A federal judge has halted certain regulations concerning abortion pills in North Carolina

Abortion Rights Protestors (Via Munank Sharma/Shutterstock)

A federal judge has permanently stopped certain efforts in North Carolina aimed at limiting how abortion pills are distributed, ruling that these efforts contradict the authority of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

However, she allowed other state laws to remain intact, providing only a partial win to a doctor who brought the lawsuit.

The injunction issued on Monday by U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles in Greensboro makes her April 30 decision final. In that ruling, she found that some of North Carolina’s regulations on medication abortion were preempted by FDA decisions, which concluded these regulations were unnecessary.

The latest order means North Carolina cannot enforce rules that require only doctors to prescribe the pills, that the medication be given in person to the patient, or that mandate a follow-up appointment. It also prevents enforcement of these rules with criminal, civil, or professional penalties.

Congress granted the FDA authority to oversee the use of mifepristone, which was approved by the agency in 2000 for ending pregnancy in combination with another drug called misoprostol.

Abortion Rights Protestors (Via Munank Sharma/Shutterstock)

Judge Eagles noted that the FDA specifically determined that restrictions similar to those in North Carolina were no longer needed, based on assessments of their safe use and distribution, as she had previously written in April.

Her ruling implies that patients in North Carolina can now obtain the pills from pharmacies, prescribed by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, or through telehealth, and use them at home, consistent with FDA decisions.

However, Judge Eagles upheld certain challenged restrictions, such as requiring an in-person consultation 72 hours before, an in-person exam, and an ultrasound before receiving a prescription. She reasoned that these rules either hadn’t been explicitly reviewed and rejected by the FDA or were more focused on medical practice and patient health in general.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

News

Rudy Giuliani, who served as mayor of New York City and as an attorney for Donald Trump, was formally processed on Monday as part...

News

Two men have been found guilty for their involvement in an armed standoff on a busy Massachusetts highway in 2021. The incident, which lasted...

News

TikTok plans to start identifying content made with artificial intelligence that comes from sources outside its own platform to combat misinformation. According to a...

News

Asian stocks showed a mix of performances on Wednesday following new record highs in U.S. markets, indicating the American economy might be slowing down...